On non-Linux, the number of vcaches in the VLRU can easily exceed
afs_maxvcount, since we allocate new vcaches when we run out. So,
assume we only have afs_vcount vcaches on the VLRU, instead of
assuming we have at most afs_maxvcount vcaches.
Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.openafs.org/8471
Tested-by: BuildBot <buildbot@rampaginggeek.com>
Reviewed-by: Derrick Brashear <shadow@your-file-system.com>
(cherry picked from commit
bc6dd95016c63d0742698d902aebf73c01162c24)
Change-Id: Id4884e45a52813eb33926958b11148a021ca3057
Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.openafs.org/8606
Reviewed-by: Michael Meffie <mmeffie@sinenomine.net>
Reviewed-by: Paul Smeddle <paul.smeddle@gmail.com>
Tested-by: BuildBot <buildbot@rampaginggeek.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephan Wiesand <stephan.wiesand@desy.de>
Tested-by: Stephan Wiesand <stephan.wiesand@desy.de>
uq = QPrev(tq);
if (tvc->f.states & CVFlushed) {
refpanic("CVFlushed on VLRU");
- /* In the other path, this was 2 * afs_cacheStats */
- } else if (!afsd_dynamic_vcaches && i++ > afs_maxvcount) {
- refpanic("Exceeded pool of AFS vnodes(VLRU cycle?)");
+ } else if (!afsd_dynamic_vcaches && i++ > afs_vcount) {
+ refpanic("Found too many AFS vnodes on VLRU (VLRU cycle?)");
} else if (QNext(uq) != tq) {
refpanic("VLRU inconsistent");
} else if (tvc->f.states & CVInit) {