rx: Remove obsolete comment

This comment refers to the fact that we used to be just checking for
SELinux to see if we should pass that extra argument. Ever since
commit cb1b41b159b98881f66319d7f65d941ba9fab911, we do have a better
test for this.

Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.openafs.org/10593
Tested-by: BuildBot <buildbot@rampaginggeek.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.c.dionne@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Derrick Brashear <shadow@your-file-system.com>
(cherry picked from commit 2ed7023b26acb3277e42eac803a0702b95167e6e)

Change-Id: I5a8ebcda7fcb85931638ab0bec807b1da8ebed3f
Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.openafs.org/10597
Reviewed-by: Michael Meffie <mmeffie@sinenomine.net>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Deason <adeason@sinenomine.net>
Tested-by: BuildBot <buildbot@rampaginggeek.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephan Wiesand <stephan.wiesand@desy.de>

diff --git a/src/rx/LINUX/rx_knet.c b/src/rx/LINUX/rx_knet.c
index 942a0724b1cd50d8727015eee17bcf0cefe8f44b..fbef6a5898ea653883741be6bc62f1bedf2a3f4f 100644 (file)
--- a/src/rx/LINUX/rx_knet.c
+++ b/src/rx/LINUX/rx_knet.c
@@ -42,9 +42,6 @@ rxk_NewSocketHost(afs_uint32 ahost, short aport)
     int pmtu = IP_PMTUDISC_DONT;
 #endif
 
-    /* We need a better test for this. if you need it back, tell us
-     * how to detect it. 
-     */
 #ifdef LINUX_KERNEL_SOCK_CREATE_V
     code = sock_create(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_UDP, &sockp, 0);
 #else