From 75046632f402c050328643220b5b44e8d545c34e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Deason Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 17:27:53 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] rx: Remove obsolete comment This comment refers to the fact that we used to be just checking for SELinux to see if we should pass that extra argument. Ever since commit cb1b41b159b98881f66319d7f65d941ba9fab911, we do have a better test for this. Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.openafs.org/10593 Tested-by: BuildBot Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne Reviewed-by: Derrick Brashear (cherry picked from commit 2ed7023b26acb3277e42eac803a0702b95167e6e) Change-Id: I5a8ebcda7fcb85931638ab0bec807b1da8ebed3f Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.openafs.org/10597 Reviewed-by: Michael Meffie Reviewed-by: Andrew Deason Tested-by: BuildBot Reviewed-by: Stephan Wiesand --- src/rx/LINUX/rx_knet.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/rx/LINUX/rx_knet.c b/src/rx/LINUX/rx_knet.c index 942a0724b..fbef6a589 100644 --- a/src/rx/LINUX/rx_knet.c +++ b/src/rx/LINUX/rx_knet.c @@ -42,9 +42,6 @@ rxk_NewSocketHost(afs_uint32 ahost, short aport) int pmtu = IP_PMTUDISC_DONT; #endif - /* We need a better test for this. if you need it back, tell us - * how to detect it. - */ #ifdef LINUX_KERNEL_SOCK_CREATE_V code = sock_create(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_UDP, &sockp, 0); #else -- 2.39.5