From 8beba712d95b637225f215534a759961ff4d80a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Meffie Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 06:55:31 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] fs: display cell not available on ESRCH The cache manager pioctls abuse ESRCH to represent errors due to unavailable cell information. Give a more sensible error message to the user when a pioctl returns an ESRCH error, instead of "no such process", which is the conventional meaning of ESRCH. The new error message is consistent with the Windows implementation of fs. For example, on a host with a misconfigured ThisCell and/or CellServDB. $ fs wscell fs: No such process becomes: $ fs wscell fs: Cell name not recognized. Change-Id: Ibdcb0957118205b9540cae07b3cafa65c51ff497 Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.openafs.org/10824 Tested-by: BuildBot Reviewed-by: D Brashear --- src/venus/fs.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/venus/fs.c b/src/venus/fs.c index cd2f82735..43294340c 100644 --- a/src/venus/fs.c +++ b/src/venus/fs.c @@ -4010,6 +4010,9 @@ Die(int errnum, char *filename) "%s: You do not have the required rights to do this operation\n", pn); break; + case ESRCH: /* hack: pioctls stole ESRCH for cell name not available errors. */ + fprintf(stderr, "%s: Cell name not recognized.\n", pn); + break; default: if (filename) fprintf(stderr, "%s:'%s'", pn, filename); -- 2.39.5