From d7e7f18887ab8cd4b4539aaf978a7d98a9b38a27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon Wilkinson <sxw@your-file-system.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:48:59 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] vol: nuke() doesn't need to zero code

We don't need to zero the result code two lines before we assign
a new value to it - just remove the pointless assignment

Caught by clang-analyzer

Change-Id: I8fefdc839ef9980d7f7703add3b11b089d524d38
Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.openafs.org/9167
Reviewed-by: Chas Williams - CONTRACTOR <chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
Tested-by: BuildBot <buildbot@rampaginggeek.com>
Reviewed-by: Derrick Brashear <shadow@your-file-system.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@your-file-system.com>
---
 src/vol/nuke.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/vol/nuke.c b/src/vol/nuke.c
index 3399de57e..7679c5098 100644
--- a/src/vol/nuke.c
+++ b/src/vol/nuke.c
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ nuke(char *aname, VolumeId avolid)
 	    li = ti;
 	}
 	if (li) free(li);
-	code = 0;		/* we really don't care about it except for debugging */
+
 	allInodes = NULL;
 
 	/* at this point, we should try to remove the volume header file itself.
-- 
2.39.5